Wave Power to the People
We pay a lot of attention to the way environmental issues are communicated; both in the media AND in the pub. When it comes to understanding problems and discussing solutions, there are some obvious hurdles.
Laziness, resistance to change, short-term thinking, self-interest… let’s call it the ‘Jeremy Clarkson’ effect ;-). But I believe that people’s perception of Science can also be a major stumbling block.
Science can seem impenetrable. This may stem from the way scientific information has traditionally been presented; the ‘Textbook’ format – pages of text with the odd illustration, and a linear structure that forces you need to read the whole thing from start to finish before any of it makes sense.
When we first scan a dense page of text, full of unfamiliar words, we make a split-second decision about whether or not to read it. Our thought process might look like this:
There’s a lot of information – I’m not sure I have time.
It looks complex – I might not get it.
Then I will feel stupid, or frustrated.
I’m going to the pub instead
We all go to great lengths to avoid feeling stupid, so we must remove this barrier if we want to engage people.
One solution is to separate information into layers. The first layer is the overall concept, and the context. It should answer these questions:
What is this about?
Why is this important?
The next layer could outline the main processes involved, and the key points that need to be made.
The last layer might be technical detail and sources of further information.
Once the information is layered, we need to present it so that the reader/viewer can explore it, in whatever order makes most sense to them. We do this naturally in any conversation – we jump about, go back to something that was mentioned earlier, and absorb information whilst allowing our own train of thought to keep its momentum.
An example of this approach is an interactive animation we’re working on, that explains the Oscillating Water Column (OWC) Method of generating electricity from wave power. (see link below)
I’m pretty scientifically minded, but when I researched this it took over 45 minutes of trawling through information from different sources to fully understand the process. There is a lot of info out there but, because the people writing it have big heads crammed full of technical knowledge, they can’t imagine what it’s like to know very little. They write what would make sense to them, but often fail to convey the absolute basics.
The animation communicates the basic concept almost instantly, and requires no scientific knowledge at all. It conveys a simple, elegant process, and helps us visualise an important piece of technology in action.
Science should not be dumbed down. But I believe we can do a lot more to hold the door open.
Related Articles: « Building Trust on the Web Who Cares About Plankton? »





Great post Joe.
“There’s a lot of information – I’m not sure I have time.”
I quite frequently do exactly that.
Presentation makes a massive difference and it’s quite easy to scare a user away very quickly. I believe this is why tabloids go with thin columns in print and online; readers see a thin slice of text and feel at ease with the amount of reading that’s ahead of them.
Your choice of column width above, and the reasonable amount of whitespace between paragraphs is also reduces the chances of scaring a user – I read to the end :-)
Animation and video are certainly an even better way to increase the chances of a user staying on the page, and the interactivity of an animation should also increase the chances of somebody actually learning about a topic.
by Phil Leggetter on Jun 16, 09:33 PM
Nice wave power animation. Very clearly shows how the air is moved to drive a turbine. I would suggest however not showing counter-rotating turbine blades unless that’s how it actually works (which I doubt, but so far have not confirmed). You might also consider showing a 3D view of the blades, to help the viewer get a sense of its fan-like operation. Finally, this might be beyond the scope of your illustration, but what happens when the waves get so high they force water into the turbine blades :-)
by Alan on Aug 2, 05:22 PM
Thanks for the comments.
Alan – we decided not to try and explain the Wells Turbine mechanism at this stage due to limited time, however, it’s another element that looks impenetrable at first glance and deserves a proper explanation!
by Joe on Aug 3, 09:51 AM
Could see a “now I get it!” on the face of several of my students! The fixed “schematic” and board drawings had obviously left a gap of understanding for some.
Some students noted the two fans running in opposite directions. Like Alan,I am not sure this is the actual technology, but I have not research it. Otherwise, it is just the basics needed.
Suggest for the water not to get so close to the turbine.
Great work! Thanks.
by Chris Barnoud on Oct 13, 04:37 PM
Your Comments